ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
The role of serial point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest to predict termination of resuscitation.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Resuscitation Success and Survival to Hospital Discharge Following In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Point-of-care-ultrasound in cardiac arrest: a useful tool for resuscitation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe decision to terminate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains challenging, particularly for patients with non-shockable rhythms (asystole/pulseless electrical activity). This study evaluated the role of serial point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in predicting the termination of resuscitation by analyzing cardiac standstill duration.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2024 to March 2025 in two academic hospitals. Adult patients (n = 154) with non-traumatic cardiac arrest (out-of-hospital or in-hospital) and non-shockable rhythms were included. Serial POCUS was performed every 2 min during CPR to assess cardiac activity. Demographics, arrest characteristics, and outcomes (death, return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC], survival to discharge) were recorded. Statistical analyses included ROC curves to determine predictive values of cardiac standstill duration for non-ROSC.
resultsThe mean age of patients was 65.19 ± 11.63 years old (a range of 35–92) and 117 (76.0%) patients were male. ROSC occurred in 24.7% of cases, and 5.8% survived to discharge. Cardiac activity on initial POCUS was associated with higher ROSC rates (52.1% vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001) and survival (16.7% vs. 0.69%, p < 0.001). Cardiac standstill duration ≥ 10 min had 100% specificity and positive predictive value for non-ROSC. No patients with standstill ≥ 10 min achieved ROSC or survival.
conclusionSerial POCUS during CPR can effectively predict futile resuscitation, particularly when cardiac standstill persists ≥ 10 min. The absence of cardiac activity on initial POCUS and prolonged standstill were strongly associated with non-ROSC and mortality. These findings support integrating POCUS into resuscitation protocols to guide termination decisions, though larger studies are needed for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.