ArticleConflict and health2025
What works and who knows? The importance of community and health worker perspectives in defining solutions to attacks on healthcare
Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventions for improving resilience among healthcare workers: a systematic map.Npj mental health research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attacks against healthcare are increasingly a strategy of modern warfare, with devastating short and long-term impacts on health staff, patients, and the health system as a whole. What is the solution? Communities play a significant role in protecting healthcare in war zones, as do health workers and civil society networks. We argue existing methods can help identify operationally-relevant solutions in a timely way, facilitating response strategies co-designed with those most affected and in support of existing capacities. This commentary draws on three studies in Nigeria, South Sudan, and Democratic Republic of Congo (2022-2024) that examined health worker and community perspectives on attacks on healthcare and about response priorities in order to inform strategies to prevent attacks and reduce their impact. Here we identify two additional contributions of this research approach. First, these studies document contextually-relevant responses of community- and health worker-defined actions and priorities. Second, they provide new insights on how health worker and community perspectives can be gathered in a timely way, considering the many competing priorities of health workers and people exposed to conflict. They elicited what affected people prioritise, when asked. As such, the approaches are relevant for operational actors working in all areas where people face systematic violence against healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.