ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Optimized feature selection and advanced machine learning for stroke risk prediction in revascularized coronary artery disease patients.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning for endometriosis classification: a rule-based approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and validation of radiomics models for the diagnoses of breast lesions with calcification on ultrasound.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- TMPA-HC: a two-stage heterogeneous multi-population algorithm with cooperative search for high-dimensional feature selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality risk after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven risk assessment of severeFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting brain metastasis in breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global mortality, with stroke constituting a significant complication among patients undergoing coronary revascularization procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Previous research has demonstrated the successful application of machine learning (ML) in predicting various postoperative outcomes, including poor prognosis following cardiac surgery and the risk of postoperative stroke. Despite these advancements, a critical gap persists in studies quantitatively linking the risk of postoperative stroke to revascularization using ML-based approaches. This study aims to address this gap by developing and validating ML models to predict the risk of stroke in CAD patients undergoing coronary revascularization, with the ultimate goal of enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes.
methodsWe developed an ML framework to predict stroke risk in patients with CAD undergoing revascularization. A total of 5,757 patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Feature selection was performed using a combination of Pearson correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), ridge regression, and elastic net. Initially, 35 features were identified based on expert opinion and a comprehensive literature review; the integrated results of the feature selection methods reduced the feature set to 14. The dataset was randomly divided into training, testing, and validation subsets with proportions of 70%, 15%, and 15%, respectively. Several ML models were evaluated, including logistic regression, XGBoost, random forest, AdaBoost, Bernoulli naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and CatBoost. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, and 500 bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to ensure robust evaluation.
resultsThe CatBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.8486 (95% CI: 0.8124-0.8797) on the test set and 0.8511 (95% CI: 0.8203-0.8793) on the validation set. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), and treatment types as the most influential predictors. Notably, compared to the best existing literature, which reported an AUC of 0.760 on the test set, our model exhibited a 9% improvement in predictive performance while utilizing a more parsimonious feature set.
conclusionBy integrating four feature selection methods, we significantly streamlined the feature set, resulting in a more efficient and reliable predictive model. We propose the CatBoost model for the prediction of postoperative stroke in patients with CAD undergoing coronary revascularization. With its high accuracy, the proposed model offers valuable insights for medical practitioners, enabling informed decision-making and the implementation of preventive measures to mitigate stroke risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.