ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Evaluating core stability training-based combination therapies for lower extremity dysfunction post-stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation-based combination interventions for post-stroke lower limb rehabilitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Core muscle rehabilitation during early mobilization after stroke: a narrative review and clinical framework.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a severe neurological disorder that poses a significant threat to patients’ health and imposes a heavy burden on healthcare resources. This study aims to systematically evaluate the synergistic effects of core stability training combined with various rehabilitation interventions to identify the optimal treatment strategy for lower extremity dysfunction in stroke patients, providing stronger evidence for clinical practice.
methodsThis study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before May 12, 2025. The included studies met the following criteria: Participants were stroke patients with lower extremity dysfunction; The intervention in the experimental group involved core stability training or core stability training combined with other rehabilitation measures; The control group received either core stability training alone or conventional rehabilitation treatment; Outcome measures included balance ability, functional mobility, lower extremity motor ability, and walking ability; Study design was RCT. We searched six databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and SinoMed (China Biology Medicine), and conducted a network meta-analysis using R studio and Stata 15.0. We used the Risk of Bias 2.0 (ROB 2.0) tool to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
resultsFor balance ability in stroke patients, the rehabilitation effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with core stability training (NMES + CST) seemed to be the most effective, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 90.82%. For functional mobility of lower extremity in stroke patients, proprioceptive training combined with core stability training (PT + CST) appeared to show the best rehabilitation effect (SUCRA = 93.24%). For motor ability of lower extremity, acupuncture therapy combined with core stability training (AT + CST) seemed to be the most effective (SUCRA = 90.83%). For walking ability, motor imagery training combined with core stability training (MIT + CST) seemed to be the optimal rehabilitation effect (SUCRA = 93.87%). Cluster analysis results indicated that the optimal treatment regimens for stroke-induced lower extremity dysfunction were PT + CST (SUCRA = 58.29%/SUCRA = 93.24%/ SUCRA = 63.59%/SUCRA = 56.03%) and AT + CST(SUCRA = 65.62%/SUCRA = 90.83%/SUCRA = 60.25%).
conclusionsNMES + CST, PT + CST, AT + CST, and MIT + CST are four effective core stability training combination therapies. Comprehensive evaluation results indicate that AT + CST or PT + CST seems to be the optimal core stability training combination therapy for lower extremity dysfunction in stroke patients. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024588917.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.