ArticleConflict and health2025
Chronic disease patients during the armed conflict in Sudan: a cross-sectional study on mental health and quality of life.
Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and associated factors of anxiety and depression among hemodialysis patients in Sudan during armed conflict: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Observational
- Clinical complications and psychological distress of patients requiring dialysis during the Sudan conflict in Al-Qadarif State: a cross-sectional study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases represent a major global health burden, with their impact becoming even more pronounced in conflict settings. In such environments, the mental health and quality of life of chronic disease patients often deteriorate due to the disruptions caused by war. This study aimed to assess mental health issues among chronic disease patients and evaluate their quality of life during the ongoing armed conflict in Sudan.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among chronic disease patients in the safest states of Sudan during the current war. Mental health was assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 for anxiety, and quality of life was evaluated using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level scale. Chi-square tests and Spearman's rank examined associations between socio-demographic factors and mental health outcomes. Multiple linear regression identified predictors influencing mental health issues, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
resultsAmong 1116 chronic disease patients, the median depression score was 7 (IQR = 8), with 50.3% reporting mild to moderate depression, while the median anxiety score was 6 (IQR = 8), with 47.1% experiencing mild to moderate anxiety. Depression showed significantly strong positive correlation with anxiety (ρ = 0.810, p < 0.00). In terms of health-related quality of life, the pain/discomfort domain showed 40.7% of patients reporting moderate to extreme problems, followed by the anxiety/depression domain at 43.4%, making these the most affected areas.
conclusionThis study revealed high levels of depression and anxiety among Sudanese chronic disease patients during the war, alongside a notably poor quality of life. The findings underscore the urgent need for intervention to implement targeted mental health support programs, aiming to improve the quality of life for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.