ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Incorporating exon-exon junction reads enhances differential splicing detection.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: a review of technical considerations for planning an RNA-Sequencing experiment.BMC genomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a gold standard technology for studying gene and transcript expression. Different transcripts from the same gene are usually determined by varying combinations of exons within the gene, formed by splicing events. One method of studying differential alternative splicing between groups in short-read RNA-seq experiments is through differential exon usage (DEU) analysis, which uses exon-level read counts along with downstream statistical testing strategies. However, the standard exon counting method does not consider exon-junction information, which may reduce the statistical power in detecting splicing alterations.
resultsWe present a new workflow for differential splicing analysis, called differential exon-junction usage (DEJU). This DEJU analysis workflow adopts a new feature quantification approach that jointly summarises exon and exon-exon junction reads, which are then integrated into the established Rsubread-edgeR/limma frameworks. We performed comprehensive simulation studies to benchmark the performance of DEJU against existing methods. We also applied DEJU to a mouse mammary gland RNA-seq dataset, revealing biologically meaningful splicing events that could not be detected previously.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that incorporating exon-exon junction reads significantly improves the detection of differential splicing events. The proposed DEJU workflow offers increased statistical power and computational efficiency compared to widely used existing approaches, while effectively controlling the false discovery rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.