Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707856›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Influence of simple crossmodal correspondence on interpretation of spoken intent.

John McEwan, Ada Kritikos, Mick Zeljko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John McEwanSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia. John.mcewan@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4869-3905
Ada KritikosSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Mick ZeljkoSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossmodal correspondences (CMCs) are consistent associations between sensory features from different modalities. Previous research has demonstrated that these pairings can be recruited in the resolution of the Rubin face-vase illusion. This research builds upon and expands these findings into the resolution of language ambiguity. The study uses the feature pairings of elevation/pitch, lightness/pitch, and size/pitch to influence the perceived intonation of a spoken utterance. Participants listened to a range of auditory stimuli, varying in their intent, and attempted to classify them as questions or statements. We found that change in the irrelevant visual features of elevation or lightness could bias their judgements in a manner consistent with an actual change in the pitch of the auditory stimulus. Size/pitch does not appear to affect language judgements, and we confirm this in a series of follow-up experiments. This suggests that simple crossmodal correspondences can influence high-level ambiguity resolution, at least in some cases. These findings have important implications for the use of visual cues in audiovisual language studies such as the visual world paradigm.

Indexed as

IntentionPattern Recognition, VisualPitch PerceptionSpeech PerceptionAdultAttentionCuesFemaleHumansIllusionsJudgmentMaleSize PerceptionYoung AdultMultisensory processingPsycholinguisticsSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID40707856
PMCPMC12568907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.