Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707843›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Lactic acid bacteria viability and interactions in recirculating aquaculture systems for fish farming.

Maíra Lucas de Oliveira, Isabella Maciel Costa, Marcelo Resende de Souza, Bruna Maria Salotti Souza, Daniela Chemim de Melo Hoyos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maíra Lucas de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1725-4199
Isabella Maciel CostaDepartment of Technology and Inspection of Animal Products, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9648-9565
Marcelo Resende de SouzaDepartment of Technology and Inspection of Animal Products, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7071-7304
Bruna Maria Salotti SouzaDepartment of Technology and Inspection of Animal Products, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil. salottibm@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-2426
Daniela Chemim de Melo HoyosDepartment of Animal Science, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6196-2404

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES financial code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the growing demand for more sustainable aquaculture systems, this study evaluated the viability and interactions of the potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GV17 and Lactococcus lactis GV103, either individually or in combination with a commercial bioremediator, in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). Eight treatments were tested to evaluate LAB viability under varying concentrations of nitrite (0.5-2.0 mg/L), ammonia (1.0-3.5 mg/L), pH levels (6.0-8.5), and temperatures (20 °C and 26 °C), as well as their effects on nitrite and ammonia concentrations in the system. Except for the bioremediator treatment at 26 °C, where no LAB viability was observed after 5 h at ammonia concentrations above 1.5 mg/L, all other treatments supported the growth of the strains under the tested conditions. The viability of LAB in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) was confirmed, with concentrations ranging from 13.0 to 14.0 log CFU/mL detected up to three days after inoculation in the presence of fish. After this period, reapplication was necessary. Additionally, ammonia and nitrite levels fluctuated over time, demonstrating the influence of LAB on water quality. These results indicate that Lbs. paracasei GV17 and Lactococcus lactis GV103 are capable of tolerating adverse environmental conditions and show potential for application in aquaculture systems as auxiliary agents in bioremediation.

Indexed as

AquacultureFishesLactobacillalesLactococcus lactisMicrobial ViabilityAmmoniaAnimalsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNitritesProbioticsTemperatureAmmoniaNitritesFishMicroorganismsProbioticsProduction system

Identifiers

PMID40707843
PMCPMC12350883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.