ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Lactic acid bacteria viability and interactions in recirculating aquaculture systems for fish farming.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospects and challenges in using engineered lactic acid bacteria in aquaculture applications.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In light of the growing demand for more sustainable aquaculture systems, this study evaluated the viability and interactions of the potentially probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GV17 and Lactococcus lactis GV103, either individually or in combination with a commercial bioremediator, in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). Eight treatments were tested to evaluate LAB viability under varying concentrations of nitrite (0.5-2.0 mg/L), ammonia (1.0-3.5 mg/L), pH levels (6.0-8.5), and temperatures (20 °C and 26 °C), as well as their effects on nitrite and ammonia concentrations in the system. Except for the bioremediator treatment at 26 °C, where no LAB viability was observed after 5 h at ammonia concentrations above 1.5 mg/L, all other treatments supported the growth of the strains under the tested conditions. The viability of LAB in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) was confirmed, with concentrations ranging from 13.0 to 14.0 log CFU/mL detected up to three days after inoculation in the presence of fish. After this period, reapplication was necessary. Additionally, ammonia and nitrite levels fluctuated over time, demonstrating the influence of LAB on water quality. These results indicate that Lbs. paracasei GV17 and Lactococcus lactis GV103 are capable of tolerating adverse environmental conditions and show potential for application in aquaculture systems as auxiliary agents in bioremediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.