ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Evaluating the learning curve of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the cumulative sum method.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become the standard treatment for small renal tumors, offering better perioperative outcomes than open surgery. However, objective evaluations of the RAPN learning curve are limited. While the Trifecta criteria-comprising negative surgical margins, no perioperative complications, and warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤ 25 min-are commonly used to assess surgical outcomes, they are inadequate for continuous proficiency assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the RAPN learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method based on Trifecta achievement and its components. We retrospectively analyzed 119 RAPN cases performed by three surgeons at a single institution between 2017 and 2022. All surgeons (≥ 30 cases; ≥ 15 year experience) were included. CUSUM charts were created using Trifecta achievement rates with thresholds (p₀ = 0.4, p₁ = 0.8), and further analysis was performed on individual components. Distinct learning curve transitions were observed only in Surgeon B, with proficiency achieved at the 9th case for complication rates and the 4th case for overall Trifecta achievement. No clear transitions were seen in WIT or surgical margins, or in any component for Surgeons A and C. These findings suggest that Surgeons A and C may have already attained proficiency before the study period. The CUSUM method offers a practical tool for visualizing and quantifying individual learning curves in RAPN based on clinically relevant criteria. Despite some limitations, CUSUM enables continuous, surgeon-specific assessment. Future studies should integrate additional metrics to develop more comprehensive training programs and improve surgical safety and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40707816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.