ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
External validation of population pharmacokinetic models of oxcarbazepine active metabolite in Chinese children with epilepsy.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the predictive performance of published population pharmacokinetic models of the oxcarbazepine (OXC) active metabolite, 10, 11-dihydro-10-monohydroxycarbazepine (MHD), using external data sets in Chinese children with epilepsy.
methodA total of 231 concentrations from 185 Chinese children with epilepsy were used for external validation. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for published PPK models of OXC active metabolite MHD in children. Seven models were searched and labeled A to G based on the year of publication. Prediction error, visual predictive check, and normal prediction distribution error tests were employed to assess the model's extrapolation performance. The Bayesian prediction method was applied to ascertain the influence of prior concentrations on the model's predictive performance.
resultA total of seven MHD PPK models were retrieved. Models A, D, E, and G exhibited good predictive performance in prediction-based diagnostics and visual predictive checks. The normalized predictive distribution error test shows that none of the models is suitable to describe our data. Bayesian prediction significantly improved the prediction performance of all the models with one prior observation.
conclusionThe published MHD PPK models showed extensive variation in predictive performance when extrapolated in Chinese children with epilepsy. Bayesian forecasting substantially improved the predictive performance of the model and might facilitate the customization of OXC dosing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40707789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.