SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2025
Systemic medications and dementia risk: a systematic umbrella review.
Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systemic medications and dementia risk: a systematic umbrella review.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Statin therapy on dementia in elderly type 2 diabetes patients with delirium.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Longitudinal assessment of cognitive decline and resilience in high-level Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Correlation between time in range and mild cognitive impairment in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Informing depression-specific dementia risk models: An evidence-based analysis of moderators of the depression-dementia association.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious meta-analyses have found that systemic medications may modulate dementia risk. We aimed to provide an overview of this evidence to guide clinical practice and future research.
methodsWe conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses (PROSPERO CRD42021226307), searching databases from inception to 15th April 2024. Only peer-reviewed meta-analyses examining dementia risk and systemic medications in humans were included. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study data and assessed quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Three authors independently rated the certainty of evidence for each drug using the GRADE framework.
results68 meta-analyses were included, across 11 drug categories. Across meta-analyses, available data were primarily observational. Confounding by indication and potential reverse causality were important limitations. Randomised-controlled data were rare but supported an association between treatment of hypertension and reduced dementia incidence. Overall, we found moderate certainty evidence of reduced risk of dementia associated with anti-hypertensives, statins, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and moderate certainty of increased risk with anticholinergics. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to advise repurposing any systemic drugs with the primary aim of reducing dementia risk. On the basis of our findings, we recommend proactive treatment of hypertension to reduce risk of all-cause dementia. Our findings did not find a difference between antihypertensive drug classes, but dementia risk was associated with blood pressure reading. In addition, we advise avoidance of anticholinergic drugs in cognitive impairment, with assessment of anticholinergic burden and consideration of alternatives during routine clinical contacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.