ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
Insufficient awareness of the disease and reproductive health issues in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Knowledge About the Impact of Multiple Sclerosis on Pregnancy and Maternity Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. With ongoing therapeutic advances, ending common misconceptions related to the disease and pregnancy in MS is crucial for the adherence to MS treatment. The aim of our research was to assess the level of knowledge of MS as a disease in general, to estimate the awareness of reproductive issues in MS, and to evaluate the primary sources of information in persons with MS (PwMS) and persons without MS. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study included female PwMS aged 18-49 years and male PwMS aged 18-65 years, who were matched with persons without MS of the same age, gender, and education. After obtaining informed consent, participants filled out an online questionnaire distributed via electronic mail between November 1st, 2022 and November 1st, 2023. The questionnaire consisted of a different statements regarding the clinical aspects of MS, pregnancy and reproductive health, primary source of information and subjective assessment of the knowledge.
resultsThe study included 410 PwMS and 400 persons without MS. The survey has shown higher levels of knowledge related to the disease in the PwMS group. Seven in ten PwMS disagreed with the false statement that all PwMS at some point lose the ability to walk, while 39.2% of persons without MS agreed. On the other hand, the most common answer, for all study participants, related to reproductive issues in MS was "I do not know". Over two-thirds of PwMS did not have an answer to the question related to the benefits of breastfeeding. The primary source of information for the PwMS group were neurologists (82.7%) and for persons without MS the Internet (54.4%). Persons with MS additionally received information from MS nurses. Both PwMS and persons without MS subjectively evaluated their level of knowledge as an inadequate (49.3% vs. 77.5%).
conclusionPeople with MS still have a low level of information concerning reproductive issues while a considerable number of respondents recognized a deficit of adequate information regarding MS. Availability and validity of information are key aspects to consider in the future. Improvements in access to verified information is needed with an emphasis on reproductive issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40707762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.