Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707760›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning.

Ben Li, Badr Aljabri, Derek Beaton, Leen Al-Omran, Mohamad A Hussain, Douglas S Lee, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Ori D Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ben Li *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Badr Aljabri *Department of Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Derek BeatonData Science & Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Leen Al-OmranCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad A HussainDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Douglas S LeeDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Duminda N WijeysunderaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ori D RotsteinDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Charles de MestralDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mohammed Al-OmranDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. mohammed.al-omran@unityhealth.to.

Funding

CIHR 202210MFE-489827-89477Ontario Ministry of Health Clinician Investigator ProgramPSI Foundation R22-45Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society at the University of Toronto Graduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular aortoiliac revascularization is a common treatment option for peripheral artery disease that carries non-negligible risks. Outcome prediction tools may support clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning algorithms that predict 30-day post-procedural outcomes. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent endovascular aortoiliac revascularization between 2011-2021. Input features included 37 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day post-procedural major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using pre-operative features. Overall, 6601 patients were included, and 30-day MALE/death occurred in 470 (7.1%) individuals. The best-performing model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93-0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.73-0.76). The XGBoost model accurately predicted 30-day post-procedural outcomes, performing better than logistic regression.

Identifiers

PMID40707760
PMCPMC12289885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.