ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Lactate in Anaphylaxis: 100 Years On.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactate is a ubiquitous and pleiotropic signalling molecule, with important functional effects in tissue and cellular metabolism. As an exerkine, lactate is not only substantially released from tissues during exercise but may also play a role in exercise-related medical conditions. Since exercise is a known co-factor in anaphylaxis, this may suggest a mechanistic relevance for lactate release during anaphylactic events. Here, we evaluated in vitro and in vivo evidence for lactate release from mast cells (MCs) from preclinical microdialysis studies, animal models and clinical data in anaphylaxis. Lactate levels are markedly elevated in both animal models of anaphylaxis and patients with anaphylaxis. Although not causative, lactate is clearly relevant to many different steps in anaphylaxis, including MC activation, vascular permeability and gastrointestinal dysfunction, but currently lacks a comprehensive interpretation framework in anaphylaxis. As a result, lactate cannot be currently considered a biomarker of anaphylaxis per se. However, given its wide dynamic range, a plethora of available lactate biosensors, and the ease of measurement in various biological fluids, lactate may be a potential candidate for biomarker development. At present, lactate's contribution to anaphylaxis, which was discovered a century ago by Zunz and La Barre, has not been fully elucidated. Unresolved issues in anaphylaxis include the patient's metabolic state; the kinetics of lactate release and its biological actions; MC bioenergetics and metabolome; activation thresholds; and feedback mechanisms, as well as an expression of lactate-metabolizing enzymes. A closer focus on these known unknowns may demystify the contribution of lactate in anaphylaxis and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.