Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707711›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

MRIcroGL: voxel-based visualization for neuroimaging.

Christopher Rorden

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dose-related reductions in prefrontal recruitment during cognitive reappraisal following oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in posttraumatic stress disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher RordenMcCausland Center for Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. rorden@sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-6142

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HICKOK, GREGORY · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Extending ezBIDS, NiiVue and dcm2niix for user-friendly cloud-based integration and visualizationRF1MH133701 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH133701U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) P50-DC01466U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) RF1-MH133701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID40707711
PMCPMC13555845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.