Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707699›Full record

ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2025

Role of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in enhancing phenolic compounds biosynthesis and its relevance to abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a review.

Zuzanna Jakubowska, Marcin Gradowski, Jakub Dobrzyński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Selection of aMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zuzanna JakubowskaInstitute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090, Raszyn, Poland. z.jakubowska@itp.edu.pl.
Marcin GradowskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub DobrzyńskiInstitute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, 3 Hrabska Avenue, 05-090, Raszyn, Poland. j.dobrzynski@itp.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofortification of plants using Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) represents a promising strategy in sustainable agriculture. This paper discusses the PGPB action in the context of their impact on phenolic compounds biosynthesis and the prospects for their application in agriculture. So far, no review article has summarized the significance of PGPB in increasing phenolic compounds in plants. PGPB, such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Azospirillum, promote plant growth by producing phytohormones, enhancing nutrient availability, and stimulating the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites through the activation of Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR). The activation of ISR (Induced Systemic Resistance) by PGPB stimulates the phenylpropanoid pathway, which is the primary biosynthetic route for polyphenolic compounds, including phenolic acids and flavonoids, in plants. Studies indicate that PGPB may increase phenolic compounds content from 9% to over 200%, while simultaneously improving antioxidant activity. Through the secretion of phenolic compounds, PGPB also can mitigate abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity and heavy metal contamination. Among the phenolic compounds whose production in various plant parts can be stimulated by PGPB are flavonoids, such as quercetin, procyanidin B1, EGCG, and catechin, and phenolic acids, including caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and chlorogenic acid. Advancements in omics research will enable a more precise investigation of the impact of PGPB, including endophytic bacteria, on the biosynthetic pathways of phenolic compounds. In the future, this will translate into improved efficiency in stimulating the production of these compounds. Nevertheless, even now, the use of PGPB offers a sustainable alternative to genetic engineering, reducing reliance on chemical inputs in agriculture.

Indexed as

BacteriaPhenolsPlant DevelopmentPlantsStress, PhysiologicalFlavonoidsPlant Growth RegulatorsFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant Growth RegulatorsAbiotic stress toleranceFlavonoidsSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40707699
PMCPMC12289753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.