ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025
Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prostheses: A review of the advances in surgical technique and antimicrobial strategies.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile prostheses (PPs) implantation represents a reliable treatment option for refractory erectile dysfunction (ED), yet post-operative infection remains a significant clinical challenge. Traditional management necessitates device explantation, resulting in a period of complete loss of erectile function and often a challenging delayed re-implantation due to resultant corporal scarring and penile shortening. Immediate salvage procedures, encompassing device removal followed by thorough antimicrobial washout and immediate re-implantation, offer substantial advantages with regard to penile length preservation, patient satisfaction, healthcare costs, and overall outcomes. Despite these benefits, immediate salvage procedures remain underutilized in clinical practice. Since the introduction of the Mulcahy's salvage protocol by Brant and his colleagues in 1996, numerous urologists have adopted the immediate salvage approach, reporting comparable or even superior infection-free success rates. Based on thirteen studies published over the past three decades, this review comprehensively examines their reported recent advancements in immediate salvage techniques, covering surgical innovations and evolving antimicrobial strategies.
Identifiers
40707690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.