Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707690›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prostheses: A review of the advances in surgical technique and antimicrobial strategies.

Mohammed Mahdi, Lucas Ribeiro Campos, Faysal A Yafi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed MahdiUniversity of California, Irvine Department of Urology, Irvine, CA, USA. mohamed_mahdi2002@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0607-2489
Lucas Ribeiro CamposDepartment of Urology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3718-5340
Faysal A YafiUniversity of California, Irvine Department of Urology, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9408-482X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prostheses (PPs) implantation represents a reliable treatment option for refractory erectile dysfunction (ED), yet post-operative infection remains a significant clinical challenge. Traditional management necessitates device explantation, resulting in a period of complete loss of erectile function and often a challenging delayed re-implantation due to resultant corporal scarring and penile shortening. Immediate salvage procedures, encompassing device removal followed by thorough antimicrobial washout and immediate re-implantation, offer substantial advantages with regard to penile length preservation, patient satisfaction, healthcare costs, and overall outcomes. Despite these benefits, immediate salvage procedures remain underutilized in clinical practice. Since the introduction of the Mulcahy's salvage protocol by Brant and his colleagues in 1996, numerous urologists have adopted the immediate salvage approach, reporting comparable or even superior infection-free success rates. Based on thirteen studies published over the past three decades, this review comprehensively examines their reported recent advancements in immediate salvage techniques, covering surgical innovations and evolving antimicrobial strategies.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.