ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved bone regeneration with bone targeted scaffold.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteogenic Potential of 3D Bioprinted Collagen Scaffolds Enriched with Bone Marrow Stromal Cells, BMP-2, and Hydroxyapatite in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biofabrication for complex tissue regeneration: a scoping review of translational gaps in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Engineering a BMP2-risedronate complex with sustained release for osteoporosis therapy.Archives of pharmacal research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sustained release and bone tissue-specific localization of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) are crucial factors in overcoming the shortcomings in its clinical use. In a previous study, we introduced a bone-targeted, lipoplex-loaded, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted bilayer scaffold, termed polycaprolactone-bioink-nanoparticle (PBN). We confirmed the bone-specific and sustained release of BMP-2 with PBN in silico and in vitro and demonstrated improved bone formation in vivo. In this study, we evaluated the bone-regenerative effect of PBN combined with bone-inducing drugs in the beagle 3-wall defect model, aiming to facilitate their stable and active application in clinical settings. Surgical defects were created on both sides of the beagle mandible after 4 weeks of teeth extraction (P2, P3, and P4), assigning four groups: (1) control, no scaffold; (2) BMP-2, BMP-2-loaded collagen; (3) PBN/BMP/5-aza-dC, BMP-2, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) loaded PBN scaffold; and (4) PBN/5-aza-dC, 5-aza-dC-loaded PBN scaffold. At 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively, the beagles were sacrificed, and radiographic and histological analyses were performed. The micro-computed tomography analysis revealed that the PBN/BMP/5-aza-dC and PBN/5-aza-dC groups showed significant increases in volume density and bone mineral density between 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05). The BMP-2 and PBN/BMP/5-aza-dC groups showed significantly more mineralized tissue 4 weeks postoperatively, and the largest amount of mineralized tissue was detected after 8 weeks. Based on these results, we suggest that the PBN scaffold would be a good carrier for bone-inducing drugs with bone-tissue specificity and sustained release, especially BMP-2, to reduce clinical side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.