ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based academic performance prediction with explainability for enhanced decision-making in educational institutions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the mentorship divide: how large language models could reshape medical workforce equity.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting student academic performance using TabPFN and SHAP: An interpretable machine learning approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- Hidden low wellbeing among high-achieving students: model-based support-cost patterns revealed by explainable machine learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Data-driven theoretical characterization of β-decay spectra in radioisotope energy materials via artificial fish swarm optimized adaptive kernel density estimation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Using machine learning to predict student outcomes for early intervention and formative assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Education is crucial for the growth of effective life skills and the allocation of needed resources. Higher education institutions are adopting advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to enhance traditional teaching methods. Predicting academic performance has become increasingly important, improving university rankings and expanding student opportunities. This study addresses challenges in performance analysis, quality education delivery, and student evaluation through machine learning (ML) models. Ten regression models including K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Linear Regression, CatBoost, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and ensemble voting regression (VR) algorithm based on the top five heterogeneous regressors as base models are employed to predict academic outcomes. Two datasets with distinct feature sets and sizes were used to evaluate the generalizability of the models. The first dataset comprises 10,000 samples and six features focused on study behaviors, prior performance, and extracurricular activities. The second dataset includes 6,607 records and 20 features encompassing academic habits, demographic attributes, and institutional factors such as attendance, teacher quality, and parental involvement. Best model performance goes to the linear regression in standalone ML models. Then, the proposed ensemble VR model was built using weighted averages based on the performances of the base models. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are then used to explain the predictions produced by the proposed ensemble VR model. For the first dataset, the VR model achieved an RMSE of 0.1050, MAE of 0.0837, and R² of 0.9890. On the second, more complex dataset, the VR model also performed best with an R² of 0.7716 using the full feature set, highlighting its robustness and adaptability across diverse academic contexts. These results offer actionable insights for educators, administrators, and policymakers to better understand student performance drivers and support data-informed educational strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.