Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707614›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-based academic performance prediction with explainability for enhanced decision-making in educational institutions.

Wesam Ahmed, Mudasir Ahmad Wani, Pawel Plawiak, Souham Meshoul, Amena Mahmoud, Mohamed Hammad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wesam AhmedDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Hurghada University, Hurghada, Egypt.
Mudasir Ahmad WaniEIAS Data Science Lab, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia.
Pawel PlawiakDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, Krakow, 31-155, Poland.
Souham MeshoulDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. Sbmeshoul@pnu.edu.sa.
Amena MahmoudComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt.
Mohamed HammadEIAS Data Science Lab, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586, Saudi Arabia. mhammad@psu.edu.sa.

Funding

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2025R196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Education is crucial for the growth of effective life skills and the allocation of needed resources. Higher education institutions are adopting advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to enhance traditional teaching methods. Predicting academic performance has become increasingly important, improving university rankings and expanding student opportunities. This study addresses challenges in performance analysis, quality education delivery, and student evaluation through machine learning (ML) models. Ten regression models including K-Nearest Neighbors Regressor, Linear Regression, CatBoost, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and ensemble voting regression (VR) algorithm based on the top five heterogeneous regressors as base models are employed to predict academic outcomes. Two datasets with distinct feature sets and sizes were used to evaluate the generalizability of the models. The first dataset comprises 10,000 samples and six features focused on study behaviors, prior performance, and extracurricular activities. The second dataset includes 6,607 records and 20 features encompassing academic habits, demographic attributes, and institutional factors such as attendance, teacher quality, and parental involvement. Best model performance goes to the linear regression in standalone ML models. Then, the proposed ensemble VR model was built using weighted averages based on the performances of the base models. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are then used to explain the predictions produced by the proposed ensemble VR model. For the first dataset, the VR model achieved an RMSE of 0.1050, MAE of 0.0837, and R² of 0.9890. On the second, more complex dataset, the VR model also performed best with an R² of 0.7716 using the full feature set, highlighting its robustness and adaptability across diverse academic contexts. These results offer actionable insights for educators, administrators, and policymakers to better understand student performance drivers and support data-informed educational strategies.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceDecision MakingMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansLinear ModelsStudentsUniversitiesAcademic performance predictionArtificial intelligence in educationEducational decision-makingMachine learning modelsVoting regressionXAI

Identifiers

PMID40707614
PMCPMC12290028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.