ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative characterization of FDM structures with electrically-conductive sensing elements under static, dynamic and thermal loads.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geometrically Optimized FDM-Printed Conductive TPU Bend Sensors for Hand Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF), or fused deposition modeling (FDM), is one of the most widely accessible additive manufacturing (AM) processes. Recent advancements in this technology have expanded its material portfolio to include conductive composites with electromechanical properties, enabling new applications. The thermal melting of the filament, required for material extrusion, introduces variability in the final component properties, which are difficult to predict due to the influence of several process-related parameters. In particular, for applications where mechanical and electrical properties are critical, it is essential to optimize the process to control both the mechanical performance and electrical conductivity of the material in static and dynamic conditions. Post-process thermal treatments can significantly alter these electromechanical transduction properties. In this study, we investigate the static, dynamic, and thermal behavior of two composite filaments. The microstructure of the feedstock materials was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to establish a correlation between material composition and component behavior. The results demonstrate that the inclusion of specific fillers, such as black carbon, enhances electrical resistance and improves electromechanical stability under static and dynamic conditions. In contrast, graphene additives increase electromechanical sensitivity but result in a degradation of electrical properties during thermal treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.