ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel transcendental metaphor metaheuristic algorithm based on power method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel metaheuristic algorithm-the Power Method Algorithm (PMA), which is inspired by the power iteration method to solve complex optimization problems. PMA simulates the process of computing dominant eigenvalues and eigenvectors, incorporating strategies such as stochastic angle generation and adjustment factors, effectively addressing eigenvalue problems in large sparse matrices. The algorithm is rigorously evaluated on 49 benchmark functions from the CEC 2017 and CEC 2022 test suites. Quantitative analysis reveals that PMA surpasses nine state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms and performs better, with average Friedman rankings of 3, 2.71, and 2.69 for 30, 50, and 100 dimensions, respectively. Statistical tests including the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Friedman test further confirm the robustness and reliability. Additionally, PMA demonstrates exceptional performance in solving eight real-world engineering optimization problems, consistently delivering optimal solutions. Experimental results show that PMA achieves an effective balance between exploration and exploitation, effectively avoiding local optima while maintaining high convergence efficiency. Therefore, PMA demonstrates notable competitiveness and practical value in interdisciplinary complex optimization tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.