Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707566›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Simulating population dynamics of sea turtles in a high survival world.

Michael D Arendt, Jeffrey A Schwenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael D ArendtMarine Resources Division, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, 217 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA. arendtmd@dnr.sc.gov.
Jeffrey A SchwenterMarine Resources Division, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, 217 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA.

Funding

National Marine Fisheries Service NA21NMF4720491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, nest counts for many sea turtles now routinely exceed pre-conservation levels but also exhibit increased inter-annual variability. Mixed trend interpretations support population growth constraints but differ regarding why. Here we used a closed-loop population simulator to report generalized patterns of demographic change under assumptions of random variability that tended both above and below the null model scenario of no change over decades. Random changes in nine life history parameters spanning sea turtle hatching to eventual sexual maturity from 1950 through 2018 provided context for comparison with three decades of published nesting data for a globally important loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) population through 2018. Six demographic metrics (nests, mature abundance, immature abundance, mature sex ratio, immature sex ratio, and neritic survival equivalent [NSE]) computed from simulations better predicted each other than their respective prediction by any of the annual simulator inputs. Irrespective of maturity status, abundance fluctuated widely and inversely to age group sex ratio. The ratio of older (ages 20-29) to younger (ages 10-19) individuals provided the best lagged (21 years) prediction of annual nest counts. Our novel findings substantiate demographic metrics for monitoring, plus forecast a future annual nest count oscillation even with high survival (0.93).

Indexed as

TurtlesAnimalsComputer SimulationFemaleMaleNesting BehaviorPopulation DynamicsSex Ratio

Identifiers

PMID40707566
PMCPMC12290116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.