ArticleScientific reports2025
Failure analysis of hybrid fiber reinforced polymer composite tubes subjected to quasi-static compressive load: an experimental study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on the failure analysis of hybrid woven jute and glass fiber-reinforced structural composite tubes with circumferential circular holes under quasi-static testing. Process parameters were optimized to obtain outputs including maximum stress, energy absorption, and specific energy absorption by considering hole diameter, length of the tube, and number of holes drilled as input. Results portray that the crash behaviour of the composite tubes was dependent on the number of holes drilled on the circumference and the analysis of variance results revealed that the interaction between all the process parameters affected the output variables. Energy absorption and specific energy absorption were found to be maximum for the composite tubes of 70 mm length drilled with 4 holes each of diameter 12 mm. Optimal energy absorption of hybrid composite tubes was 87.11 J and the specific energy absorption was 1.527 J/g. A regression model was also developed to predict energy absorption and specific energy absorption. Confirmation experiments portrayed an appreciable correlation between the predicted and experimental values with a less than 5 % margin of error for energy absorption and a less than 2 % margin of error for specific energy absorption. The failure mechanism of the hybrid composite tubes was analyzed using photographs of the composite tubes from which the major failure mechanism was observed to be buckling failure through longitudinal crack propagation. Such short composite columns find their applications in roll-over protection in automobiles, as retrofits in construction applications and developing modular structural designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.