ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a prognostic model for nasal cavity squamous cell carcinoma based on the SEER database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to construct and validate a prognostic nomogram for predicting cause-specific survival (CSS) in patients with nasal cavity squamous cell carcinoma (NCSCC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from NCSCC patients registered in the SEER database between 2007 and 2015. Statistical analyses were performed to assess CSS rates and identify prognostic factors. The study cohort comprised 580 NCSCC patients, with CSS probabilities of 89.1%, 74.8%, and 63.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and radiotherapy administration as independent prognostic factors significantly associated with CSS. The accuracy of the prediction was evaluated using the C-index and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was utilized to compare the nomogram with the AJCC stage system in order to assess its superiority. We developed and validated a predictive model for 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS in NCSCC based on a large retrospective cohort. The nomogram demonstrates clinical utility in guiding individualized treatment strategies and patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.