ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning-based approach to predict depression in Chinese older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a longitudinal study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning-based screening model for the risk of depression among the elderly in China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Prediction of depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adult hospitalized patients with chronic diseases: a multicenter study in Anhui, China using machine learning methods.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Depression Risk Prediction Models for Older Adults Analyzing From the Perspective of the Health Ecology Model: A Scoping Review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Global trends and health inequalities in mental disorders among older adults: a comprehensive analysis using global burden of disease 2021 data.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to identify depressive risks in elderly individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and develop a predictive model using machine learning algorithms to enable timely interventions.Data from the 2015 and 2018 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were used, including 1,921 elderly individuals. Depression was assessed with the CESD-10 scale. Three machine learning models-Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Boosted XGBoost-were used to predict depression risk over three years, incorporating 10 demographic, 5 health, 13 chronic disease, 3 lifestyle, and 2 physical function factors. Lasso feature selection identified 10 key variables for model training. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Among all evaluated models, Boosted XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the test set (AUC = 0.893), outperforming both Gradient Boosting (AUC = 0.887) and Random Forest (AUC = 0.861). However, Random Forest (RF) achieved superior sensitivity. Consequently, we performed feature importance analysis using both Boosted XGBoost and RF models. The results identified five significant predictors of depression in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD): educational attainment, digestive health status, arthritis diagnosis, sleep duration, and residential location.The machine learning model developed in our study demonstrates strong predictive performance for depression risk among older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), enabling early identification of high-risk individuals. These findings provide a scientific foundation for understanding depression progression mechanisms and developing personalized intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.