Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Correction: Reliability, validity and minimum clinical importance difference of the Chinese version of the Zurich claudication questionnaire.

Yi-Xuan Gao, Zhi-Wen Weng, Hui Shao, Han Bo, Zhi-Hui Chen, Meng Song, Lu-Ping Liu, Ling-Yun Zhang, Jia-Yu Liu, Yu-Han Wang and 7 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yi-Xuan Gao *First clinical college, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Wen Weng *Tuina and pain management department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hui ShaoTuina and pain management department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Han BoTuina and pain management department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Hui ChenLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Meng SongLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Lu-Ping LiuTraditional Chinese medicine department, Yongshun Community Health Service Center, Beijing, China.
Ling-Yun ZhangFirst clinical college, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jia-Yu LiuFirst clinical college, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yu-Han WangFirst clinical college, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meng-Meng ZhangFirst clinical college, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xi-You WangTuina and pain management department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ya-Nan SunTraditional Chinese medicine department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chang-He YuTuina and pain management department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xi-You Wang, Haiyuncang Road 5, Dongcheng, Beijing, China. dzmyywxy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5829-0573
Ya-Nan Sun, Changchun Street 45, Xicheng district, Beijing, China. sunny726618@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5356-799X
Chang-He Yu, Haiyuncang Road 5, Dongcheng, Beijing, China. yakno2@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-6229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID40707538
PMCPMC12289901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.