Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707533›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neural responses to peers moderate conversation-drinking associations in daily life.

Mia Jovanova, Ovidia Stanoi, Christin Scholz, Bruce Doré, Danielle Cosme, Yoona Kang, Nicole Cooper, Zachary M Boyd, Dani S Bassett, Peter J Mucha and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mia JovanovaSchool of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. mia.jovanova@mtec.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3634-4449
Ovidia StanoiAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8373-7332
Christin ScholzFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-7504
Bruce DoréDesautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Danielle CosmeAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8956-4053
Yoona KangDepartment of Psychology, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5564-5090
Nicole CooperAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4672-5461
Zachary M BoydDepartment of Mathematics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-7295
Dani S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6183-4493
Peter J MuchaDepartment of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-7230
David M Lydon-StaleyAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8702-3923
Kevin N OchsnerDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York City, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-2129
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. emily.falk@asc.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-1846

Funding

Person-specific dynamic networks of nicotine withdrawal: implications for smoking cessationK01DA047417 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LYDON, DAVID MARTIN · 2019 to 2023
$763k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversations shape future behaviors, particularly among young adults. However, young adults vary widely in their susceptibility to peer influence. What neural processes relate to this susceptibility? We examined whether activity in brain regions associated with social rewards and making sense of others' minds relates to a common health behavior-drinking, following conversations about alcohol. We studied ten social groups of college students (N = 104 students; 4760 total observations) across two university campuses. We collected whole-brain fMRI data while participants viewed photographs of peers with whom they tended to drink at varying frequencies. Next, using ecological momentary assessment, we tracked alcohol conversations and drinking twice daily for 28 days. On average, talking about alcohol was associated with a higher likelihood of next-day drinking. Controlling for baseline drinking, participants who responded more strongly to peers with whom they drank alcohol more frequently-in brain regions associated with social rewards and mentalizing-showed a stronger, positive association between alcohol conversations and next-day drinking. Conversely, stronger neural responses to peers with whom they drank less frequently decoupled associations between alcohol conversations and next-day drinking. We conceptually replicate prior findings linking conversations and drinking in an observational, longitudinal setting and provide new evidence that neural responses to peers moderate links between alcohol conversations and drinking behavior among young adults.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingBrainPeer GroupAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleStudentsYoung AdultAlcohol useEMA (ecological momentary assessment)Functional neuroimagingHealth behaviorSocial groupsSocial influence

Identifiers

PMID40707533
PMCPMC12290041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.