ArticleScientific reports2025
Research of UAV 3D path planning based on improved Dwarf mongoose algorithm with multiple strategies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Reinforcement-Learning-Driven Multi-Strategy Spherical-Vector Grey Wolf Optimizer for UAV 3D Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Q-learning-based hybrid search algorithm integrating PRM and ACO for 3D UAV path planning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MEIAO: A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Information Acquisition Optimizer for Global Optimization and UAV Path Planning.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) consistently encounter complex operational environments during task execution. To enhance UAV adaptability in such environments, improve rapid and efficient path planning capabilities, and reduce operational costs, this paper proposes a 3D UAV path planning algorithm based on an improved Dwarf Mongoose Optimization (DMO) algorithm enhanced with multiple strategies. Initially, a chaos mapping-based opposition-based learning strategy is introduced to ensure a uniform distribution of the initial population in the solution space, thereby enhancing diversity and improving global search performance. Then, a golden sine function based on nonlinear weights is employed to help dwarf mongooses avoid getting trapped in local optima and to balance global exploration with local exploitation. In addition, a differential mutation strategy is incorporated, which uses difference information between individuals to guide the evolutionary process, further improving diversity and enhancing the ability to escape local optima. The efficacy of the improved algorithm, in terms of convergence precision, the ability to escape local optima, and a balanced exploration and exploitation capability, is demonstrated through ablation experiments and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Comparative evaluations on benchmark test functions demonstrate that the improved algorithm (CDMOS) outperforms the original DMO in optimization performance, convergence precision, and overall stability, achieving an average improvement of 53.5% in convergence accuracy and 35.1% in solution stability across 29 benchmark functions. Finally, the improved algorithm is applied to 3D map path planning simulations involving multiple nodes and obstacles, confirming its capability to enhance UAV robustness, adaptability, and real-time performance. In these simulations, CDMOS reduced path length by 46.0%, smoothness cost by 93.4%, and maintained a low obstacle cost, thus generating shorter, smoother, and safer flight paths. The generated flight paths are optimized in terms of both stability and efficiency, making the algorithm suitable for complex mission scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.