ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of 20 years of monitoring data reveals insufficient carbon sequestration potential of planted forests in dryland regions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carbon Sequestration Enhancement by Irrigation in a Mediterranean Pine Forest.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecological restoration has been widely regarded as an essential strategy to enhance carbon sequestration in ecologically fragile areas. However, the long-term sustainability and dynamics of carbon sequestration induced by afforestation remain uncertain, particularly in dryland river basins. Clarifying long-term carbon sequestration trends and understanding the impact of planted forests on these trends are crucial for ecological management and achieving carbon neutrality targets. In this study, we evaluated the dynamics of vegetation carbon sequestration and soil carbon storage in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) over the past two decades using annual Net Primary Production (NPP) and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) datasets. Our results indicated that afforestation significantly enhanced NPP during the initial restoration phase (NPP increased by 34%), but subsequently NPP declined (NPP decreased by 10%), whereas SOC exhibited a modest increase with a gradually decreasing growth rate over time. Increased frequencies of extreme temperature and drought events negatively affected soil moisture availability and the sustained growth of planted forests. Furthermore, land-use transitions contributing to enhanced carbon sequestration and storage approached saturation, constrained by environmental limitations and cultivated-land protection policies. Given water-resource constraints, realizing future carbon sequestration benefits in dryland ecosystems requires more strategic vegetation spatial planning within ecological restoration initiatives. Our findings provide valuable insights for carbon management strategies in the YRB and similar dryland river basins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.