ArticleScientific reports2025
Sensitivity analysis for time-to-event data accounting for intra-individual variability in time-varying covariates with missing data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Echocardiographic Parameters of Diastolic Dysfunction Are Influenced by Kidney Function: A Study in Routine Clinical Practice.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Delta-Adjusted (DA) approach in multiple imputation (MI) is applied under several key assumptions in the Cox hazard model, where two time-dependent covariates have missing observations. Missingness in these covariates is assumed to be not missing at random (NMAR) and is modeled through delta adjustments, with different delta values specified to capture deviations from the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Within the MI framework, missing values are imputed under various plausible missingness scenarios while preserving the relationship between time-dependent covariates and the event-time outcome. Event-time dependence is accounted for by assuming that missingness in covariates is influenced by an individual's treatment response or disease progression, thereby capturing intra-individual variability. Compared to other sensitivity analysis techniques, DA under MI explicitly adjusts imputed values using delta shifts, providing a structured approach to handling NMAR data. Unlike traditional methods that rely on pattern-mixture or selection models without direct imputation, DA generates multiple datasets with controlled sensitivity adjustments, ensuring a better variability assessment. Additionally, DA allows flexible assumptions regarding loss to follow-up (FU) and event occurrence through delta values, whereas other methods often rely on fixed assumptions about missingness. Its results are more interpretable, providing sensitivity bounds for treatment effects under different missing data scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.