Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707403›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Measuring Recovery Using the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Center Study on Structural Validity in Dutch Mental Health Care.

Margot Metz, Gabriëlle van Son, Floor Stuit, Nelleke van der Weerd, Erik de Groot, Edwin de Beurs

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margot MetzGGz Breburg, Mental Health Care Organization, Tilburg, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-6276
Gabriëlle van SonGGZ Rivierduinen, Mental Health Care Organization, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Floor StuitSynQuest, Cooperation of Mental Health Care Organizations, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1297-2006
Nelleke van der WeerdGGZ InGeest, Mental Health Care Organization, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Erik de GrootDimence Group, Mental Health Care Organization, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Edwin de BeursArkin, Mental Health Care Organization, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) is a recovery orientated measure, originating from Scotland, which is increasingly used in Dutch mental health care. The aim of this study is to extend previous research into the structural validity of the I.ROC. We investigated the factor structure of the Dutch I.ROC among mental health care clients treated in various settings using data (N = 8635) from five Dutch mental health care organisations. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA, N = 4295) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, N = 4340), and tested the fit of factor structures found in previous research. EFA revealed support for both a one- and a two-factor structure: 'Total-scale' (12 items; α = 0.88), 'Empowerment' (8 items; α = 0.86) and 'Vitality and Activity' (4 items; α = 0.67). CFA indicated a good fit for a modified two-factor model found in previous research on a representative sample of the Dutch population comprising 'Wellbeing, control, network and meaningfulness' and 'Health safety and abilities' (CFI = 0.944). Furthermore, the two-factor solution of this study showed a good fit (CFI = 0.940). However, these findings were not conclusive, as the one and alternative two-, three-, or four-factor models of other studies also demonstrated an acceptable fit. For use with individual patients, inspection of scores on individual items (in a spider graph) is most useful. As proven in several studies, the one-factor structure can be used for summarisation. Additionally, multiple solutions for subscale scores proved to be a good fit. Overall, the structural validity of the I.ROC requires further investigation and research with longitudinal data is recommended.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultfactor analysisI.ROCmental health carerecoverystructural validity

Identifiers

PMID40707403
PMCPMC12289461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.