ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
"Okay in theory": a qualitative study of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk and families reporting risky sleep practices.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safer Sleep Guidance in Standalone UK Smartphone Apps for Parents of Newborns and Infants: Systematic mHealth App Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal adherence to safe infant sleep recommendations in the USA: trends and disparities from PRAMS 2016-2022.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafer sleep messages have reduced the rates of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy by 90% in England since 1990. However, deaths continue, mainly in deprived families or where unsafe sleep practices remain common. Understanding the factors influencing these decisions can help further reduce these deaths. This study explores what influences infant sleep-related care practices among caregivers of at-risk infants and those who report non-adherence to safer sleep advice.
methodsA previously collected survey of infant care practices allowed the identification of 'high scorers' based on a calculated risk score determined by background characteristics and those reporting risky behaviours as 'risky sleepers'. Semistructured telephone/online interviews took place from August to December 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key themes.
resultsTwenty-nine interviews were conducted with 28 families, with 14 'high scorers' and 15 'risky sleepers'. The key themes were trustworthy sources, interpretation of risk and desperate times call for desperate measures. Caregivers of high-risk infants generally understood and followed safer sleep guidance but described rare occasions of compromised safety, usually due to routine disruptions. Those engaging in risky sleep practices cited factors such as sleep deprivation, past experiences, self-identity and personal interpretations of safer sleep advice as influential.
conclusionsSafer sleep messages are reaching families, but targeted support is needed to prevent rare but fatal incidents. Health professionals should consistently discuss co-sleeping using improved communication strategies to enhance trust. Co-created, accessible and bitesize resources should support parents in problem-solving and planning for safer sleep during disruption to routines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.