Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40707045›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

Integrating anticipatory action in disease outbreak preparedness and response in the humanitarian sector.

Tilly Alcayna, Franziska Kellerhaus, Leo Tremblay, Chloe Fletcher, Rachel Goodermote, Mauricio Santos-Vega, Juan Chaves-Gonzalez, Meghan Bailey, V Bhargavi Rao, Rachel Lowe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tilly AlcaynaRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, Netherlands alcayna@climatecentre.org rachel.lowe@bsc.es bhargavi.rao@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-1039
Franziska KellerhausGerman Red Cross, Berlin, Germany.
Leo TremblayMédecins sans Frontières (MSF) Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chloe FletcherBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain.
Rachel GoodermoteInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8351-393X
Mauricio Santos-VegaRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Juan Chaves-GonzalezUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, New York, NY, USA.
Meghan BaileyRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
V Bhargavi RaoHealth in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK alcayna@climatecentre.org rachel.lowe@bsc.es bhargavi.rao@lshtm.ac.uk.
Rachel LoweCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK alcayna@climatecentre.org rachel.lowe@bsc.es bhargavi.rao@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-7343

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the humanitarian sector, anticipatory action entails acting ahead of predicted hazardous events to prevent or mitigate potential impacts and needs. It leverages early warnings to bridge preparedness and response, with a core principle being the provision of ex-ante emergency funding for preagreed early actions. Traditionally applied to extreme climatic events, there is growing interest in integrating anticipatory action into disease outbreak preparedness and response. We present an analytical framework for trigger development for climate-sensitive infectious disease outbreaks based on a review of existing and emerging practices from the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement, United Nations agencies and Médecins Sans Frontières since 2014. We propose that, depending on data availability, there are four broad approaches for trigger development. First, the humanitarian sector could scale up the release of prearranged funding based on real-time surveillance data (eg, suspected cases) while other emergency funding is secured. Second, the humanitarian sector could take advantage of weather forecasts and seasonal climate forecasts to anticipate outbreaks linked to extreme climatic events, anomalous climatic conditions or highly suitable climatic conditions. Third, to extend the lead time available for intervention, the humanitarian sector could use observed environmental and socioeconomic transmission risk factors (eg, population displacement, overcrowding, presence of vectors, weather changes) in combination with real-time surveillance data to improve early detection or curb a rapid increase in cases, while other emergency funding is secured. Fourth, data-driven outbreak forecasting using seasonal forecasts can help extend the lead time further to make informed decisions about future risks. We present examples and discuss the trade-offs between approaches. As anticipatory action for outbreaks becomes established, we expect that future applications will integrate all four approaches.

Indexed as

AltruismDisaster PlanningDisease OutbreaksHumansCholeraClimateEnvironmental healthGlobal HealthInfections, diseases, disorders, injuriesInfectious DiseasesPrevention strategies

Identifiers

PMID40707045
PMCPMC12306327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.