ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
A Systematic, Evidence-Based Workflow for Classifying KMT2A Fusions in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Menin Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Rewiring Leukemic Transcriptional Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KMT2A fusions are a critical oncogenic driver in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with poor prognosis. Currently, there are no published somatic guidelines for fusions in AML, and developing methods to accurately classify fusions, especially those involving KMT2A, is essential for patient care. Therefore, the Laboratory for Personalized Molecular Medicine (LabPMM) KMT2A Fusions Workflow was developed utilizing the framework of the somatic guidelines by Horak et al, where classification of oncogenicity is based on points awarded for varying types of evidence. Fusions previously detected by LabPMM's CAP/CLIA-certified MyAML and MyMRD gene panels were used to test this workflow. A total of 100 KMT2A fusions were reassessed, and 97 of these had a breakpoint in the major breakpoint cluster region. There were 20 distinct partner genes for KMT2A, and the most common partners were MLLT3, ELL, AFDN, MLLT10, and AFF1. Five KMT2A fusions had a novel partner (MYB, RC3H1, SNAPC3, STPG1, and HPSE2). Breakpoints in the partner genes were assessed to better understand their potential role in driving leukemogenesis. Of the 100 fusions reassessed, 9 had a classification change. This LabPMM KMT2A Fusions Workflow provides a points-based system for curation that allows for standardization and clarity both within and among genetic diagnostic laboratories reporting on KMT2A fusions in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.