ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
Survey of Demographics, Training, Duties, and Professional Development for Variant Scientists in Genomic Medicine.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 2023 clinical laboratory genetics workforce in the United States: trends, challenges, and evolving practices.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Variant interpretation training for the genomics era: Learning outcomes to inform professional competencies and education.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic testing has proven utility in disease diagnostics, guiding clinical management and improving outcomes. Use of high-throughput sequencing by clinical laboratories has generated opportunities and challenges in data analysis, resulting in the emergence of a laboratory role termed variant scientist. The aim of this study was to characterize this laboratory role. A 30-item survey was developed to collect information describing the current demographic landscape, salary ranges, work environments, training options, and professional development of variant scientists. The survey was disseminated to individuals conducting variant analysis in the United States from November 6, 2023, to March 15, 2024. Survey responders (n = 87) were predominantly female (78%), aged ≤40 years (64%), hold advanced degrees (38% master's, 47% doctoral), and report ≥4 years of experience (75%). Responders report involvement in a diverse set of laboratory tasks and received relevant training on the job (78%). This workforce is satisfied with their career path (70%) and reports adequate support from employers, but perceives that resources and recognition from professional organizations are currently lacking. Characterization of this workforce will be of interest to individuals working as variant scientists, individuals interested in careers in variant science, and laboratory directors seeking assistance for effectively maintaining and efficiently growing clinical laboratory operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.