ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Inherited arrhythmia syndromes - Cardiogenetics.
Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Signature ECG part 5: Exercise induced syncope.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
- India-specific cardiogenetic aspects: Focus on cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherited arrhythmia syndromes long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia are rare cardiac channelopathies associated with a higher risk for malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Adequate and timely clinical management of patients remains a challenge and is often based on expert opinions and (small) cohort studies. Particularly, identification of high-risk patients continues to be difficult due to limitations in diagnostic tools and risk prediction models. Importantly, underlying causes determining the large variability in disease severity, even within families, are still unknown. A combination of rare variants in causal genes associated with the arrhythmia syndromes, non-genetic factors (i.e. age, sex) and genetic modifiers (i.e. single nucleotide polymorphisms) are thought to be of influence on the clinical phenotype and variability. Although, our knowledge regarding these rare arrhythmia syndromes has grown over the past decades, there are still gaps in knowledge that remain to be elucidated. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current knowledge and guidance for the clinical management of the three main arrhythmia syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.