Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40706703›Full record

SynthesisValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2025

Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis.

Babasoji E Oyemakinde, Danielle Ryan, Techna Cadet, Tyler Judge, Manesh Gopaldas, Ali Jalali, Sean M Murphy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Babasoji E OyemakindeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: beo4006@med.cornell.edu.
Danielle RyanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Techna CadetSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Tyler JudgeDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Manesh GopaldasDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Ali JalaliDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sean M MurphyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Utilization of health services after engagement with opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider by individuals with and without post-traumatic stress disorderP30DA040500 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Yuhua Bao · 2015 to 2026
$20.7M
Health and Economic Outcomes of Treatment with Extended-Release Naltrexone Among Pre-Release Prisoners with Opioid Use DisorderR01DA046721 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MURPHY, SEAN M. · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA040500NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOpioids remain a leading cause of death in the United States, and time free from opioid use is a common measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations of opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. This study reviews the economic evaluation literature on OUD, identifies studies that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on time free from opioids, and establishes a benchmark for comparison in future research.

methodsThe review examined economic evaluations of OUD interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature from inception to September 2024. ICERs of cost per period of opioid-free time were extracted or calculated from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Monetary values were converted to 2024 USD and ICERs normalized to cost per opioid-free year (OfY). Articles were classified by intervention location (United States vs international) and economic perspective.

resultsFourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from the United States, 4 from Australia, 1 from Malaysia, and 1 from the United Kingdom. Among the US-based studies, the average ICER per OfY for the healthcare-sector, the state policymaker, and the societal perspective were $243 053/OfY, $17 674/OfY, and $32 125/OfY, respectively. For international studies, average ICERs for the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives were $79 765/OfY and $195 980/OfY, respectively.

conclusionsCost per OfY is a widely used metric in economic evaluations because of its relative importance as a measure of clinical effectiveness. However, a universally accepted benchmark for decision making does not yet exist. This review aggregates data from existing studies that provided this measure, offering an initial step for establishing a cost-effectiveness threshold for cost per OfY.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioidcost-effectiveness analysiscost per opioid-free yeareconomic evaluationopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID40706703
PMCPMC12406688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.