Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40706452›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2025

Genomic landscape and molecular evolutionary trajectories of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma and benign angiomyolipoma.

Aihetaimujiang Anwaier, Yuanyuan Qu, Shiqi Ye, Xi Tian, Shuxuan Zhu, Siqi Zhou, Guohai Shi, Yu Zhu, Hailiang Zhang, Dingwei Ye and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aihetaimujiang AnwaierDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: 15301050052@fudan.edu.cn.
Yuanyuan QuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: quyy1987@163.com.
Shiqi YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: shiqiye7@163.com.
Xi TianDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: TianxiStudying@163.com.
Shuxuan ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: zhushuxuan0411@163.com.
Siqi ZhouDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: zhousiqiz@163.com.
Guohai ShiDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: guohaishi@126.com.
Yu ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: yuzhu10@fudan.edu.cn.
Hailiang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Urology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, PR China. Electronic address: hailiang_zhang@fudan.edu.cn.
Dingwei YeDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: dingwei_ye@fudan.edu.cn.
Wenhao XuDepartment of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: xwhao0407@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShanghai Municipal Health Bureau Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) encompasses benign variants (lipomatous [L-AML], myomatous [M-AML]) and epithelioid AML (eAML), a potentially malignant subtype associated with aggressive behavior. While TSC1/TSC2 mutations are frequent, the molecular drivers underlying eAML pathogenesis remain unclear. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 35 AML samples (15 eAML, 10 L-AML, 10 M-AML) with matched germline controls. Driver genes were identified using OncodriveCLUST and MutSigCV. Validation was conducted on 71 FFPE samples integrating expression profiling and survival analysis. The finding suggested that TSC2 emerged as the most frequently mutated pathogenic gene in AML, exhibiting a mutation rate of 69 %. TSC2, POLDIP2, NEFH, and MUC2 emerged as potential driver genes across AML subtypes, whereas RHPN2, ASXL1, TOP3B, and USP35 showed subtype-specific mutations. Notably, distinct cytogenetic aberrations were observed among AML variants, including deletions at 3p26.3, 5p13.1, 6p22.1, and 11p11.11. Clonal evolution analysis suggested that l-AML and eAML, as well as M-AML and eAML, may originate from a common ancestral clone, retaining early mutations and acquiring additional alterations post-divergence. Low TSC2/POLDIP2 and high NEFH/MUC2 expression correlated with favorable survival in eAML patients. Importantly, lower TSC2/POLDIP2 expression also predicted superior response rates to Everolimus therapy. In conclusion, our study comprehensively delineates genomic distinctions and evolutionary trajectories among renal AML subtypes, establishing TSC2, POLDIP2, NEFH, and MUC2 as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic predictors, facilitating precision medicine in eAML management.

Indexed as

AngiomyolipomaBiomarkers, TumorEvolution, MolecularGenomicsKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedExome SequencingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisTuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 ProteinBiomarkers, TumorTSC2 protein, humanTuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 ProteinClonal evolutionGenomic featuresRenal angiomyolipomaRenal epithelioid angiomyolipomaTumor evolutionWhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40706452
PMCPMC12446979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.