ArticleBlood advances2025
Measurable residual disease detection after CAR-T may predict response in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of cell-free DNA in lymphomas: from sample collection to genotyping and minimal residual disease monitoring.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, optimization strategies, and salvage options for CAR-T cell therapy.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Biomarker-empowered precision navigation of CAR-T cell therapy.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- ctDNA MRD after CAR-T.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractDespite responses of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), over half of patients eventually relapse. Methods to detect early disease persistence are needed to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure. We recently developed MAESTRO, an ultrasensitive, tumor-informed measurable residual disease (MRD) assay, which can detect parts-per-million (ppm) levels of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using minimal sequencing. We applied MAESTRO to 140 samples from 28 patients (15 durable responders at 12 months and 13 nonresponders) to identify treatment failure after axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), administered at our institution between 2018 and 2022. Responder and nonresponder patients had similar baseline tumor burden. By 1 week after infusion, responders had marked ctDNA reduction compared to nonresponders (P < .001). At weeks 2 and 4, responders had ctDNA levels approaching 0 ppm, whereas nonresponders had persistence of ctDNA (each P < .001). At day 0, up to 21% of patients had ctDNA fractions <0.01%; hence, these individuals would not have qualified for ctDNA monitoring with a less sensitive test. Our results confirm the feasibility of highly sensitive MRD detection by ctDNA for early identification of patients at high risk of disease progression from axi-cel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.