ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Facilitating Access and Adherence to Physical Activity and Exercise for Service Users With Neurological Conditions in the Community: A Service Evaluation.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleMany service users with neurological conditions do not meet the recommended physical activity requirements. Cultivating early and ongoing access to physical activity and exercise opportunities is vital to improve or maintain function and general health in this vulnerable group.
aimTo evaluate the impact of a pathway that aimed to facilitate access and adherence to physical activity and exercise for service users with neurological conditions.
methodsA London-based NHS healthcare team providing community neurorehabilitation developed a pathway in co-production with public health, local authority, third sector parties and service users to facilitate physical activity and exercise opportunities. First, NHS neurophysiotherapists offered a bespoke programme on exercise, physical activity and education to service users for up to 12 weeks. The pathway continued in local gyms, supported by a fitness instructor, for at least a further 12 weeks. Using a pre-post design, outcomes relating to function, strength and physical activity were recorded at baseline, 6-12 weeks (health care) and 6 weeks later (telephone survey after transition to local gyms). Data analysis was descriptive.
resultsThirty-five service users (20 men), mean (SD) age 60 (15), with a range of neurological conditions, were eligible and included. Ten participants dropped out: eight (23%) for medical reasons, two (6%) for other reasons. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, four (11%) service users could not transition when facilities closed in March 2020. Analysis showed potential beneficial effects on function, strength and physical activity for service users as well as reduced waiting times to access the NHS and local gyms.
conclusionOutcomes suggested the pathway enabled service users to access and adhere to physical activity and exercise following neurorehabilitation. This evaluation included small numbers but could inform service development and future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.