ArticleNucleic acids research2025
A cluster-based cell-type deconvolution of spatial transcriptomic data.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals systemic and intestinal responses to heat stress in finishing pigs.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Article
- Five tenets for advancing evidence-based precision medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- SR2P: an efficient stacking method to predict protein abundance from gene expression in spatial transcriptomics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mapping safety in space: the emerging role of spatial transcriptomics in safe drug development.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) has emerged as an efficient technology for mapping gene expression within tissue sections, offering informative spatial context for gene activities. However, most current ST techniques suffer from low spatial resolution, where each spatial location often contains cells of various types. Deconvolution methods are used to resolve the cell mixture within the spots, but conventional approaches rely on spot-by-spot analyses, which are limited by low gene expression levels and disregard spatial relationships between spots, ultimately reducing performance. Here, we introduce DECLUST, a cluster-based deconvolution method to accurately estimate the cell-type composition in ST data. The method identifies spatial clusters of spots using both gene expression and spatial coordinates, hence preserving the spatial structure of the tissue. Deconvolution is subsequently performed on the aggregated gene expression of individual clusters, mitigating the challenges associated with low expression levels in individual spots. We evaluate DECLUST on simulated ST datasets from a human breast cancer tissue and two real ST datasets from human ovarian cancer and mouse brain. We compare DECLUST to current methods including CARD, GraphST, Cell2location, and Tangram. The results indicate that DECLUST not only maintains the spatial integrity of tissues but also outperforms existing methods in terms of robustness and accuracy. In conclusion, DECLUST provides an effective and reliable approach for identifying cell-type compositions in ST data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.