ArticleNucleic acids research2025
ExcludonFinder: mapping transcriptional overlaps between neighboring genes.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antisense RNA controls the degradation of phycobilisomes in heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria by a transcriptional interference mechanism.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria regulate neighboring genes via overlapping transcription in untranslated regions (UTRs), forming excludons. This overlap leads to transcriptional interference and RNase III-mediated mRNA degradation, resulting in mutually exclusive gene expression, where the activation of one gene suppresses its neighbor. Although individual examples of excludons have been described in various bacterial species, a comprehensive excludon map of a bacterial genome has yet to be established. In this study, we constructed the excludon map of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus using publicly available RNA-seq data and a newly developed computational tool, ExcludonFinder (https://excludonfinder-unavarra.com). Our analysis identified 16 divergent and 165 convergent excludons in E. coli, as well as 10 divergent and 28 convergent excludons in S. aureus. To validate these findings, we used four independent datasets: detection of double-stranded RNA capture via the Tombusvirus p19 protein, accumulation of short RNAs from RNase III activity, overlap with predicted transcriptional terminators, and single-cell expression analysis. As a proof of concept, we examined transcriptional changes in E. coli under antibiotic stress, revealing that the relBE-ydfV excludon exhibits opposing expression patterns in response to multiple antibiotics. Our findings reveal the widespread presence of excludons and their broad relevance in bacterial gene regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.