ArticlePloS one2025
A node influence ranking algorithm combining k-shell iteration and node degree.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying key nodes in complex networks holds significant application value in fields such as information dissemination and disease spread. The traditional K-shell decomposition method has low time complexity and is suitable for large-scale complex networks; however, it only considers global positional information, leading to lower discrimination. To improve the K-shell decomposition method, many approaches have been proposed by researchers. However, there no algorithm has yet that simultaneously uses the iteration factor and degree to further distinguish nodes with the same K-shell value. To address this issue, we propose a node influence ranking algorithm that integrates K-shell iteration, node degree, and neighbor information, considering both global network position and local topology. Through simulation experiments on eight networks, it was verified that this method provides more accurate ranking results compared to dc, bc, cc, k-shell, Ks + , KSIF, LGI and DCK methods on eight networks, with an average accuracy improvement of 5.15% over the second-best algorithm. In identifying the top 10 key nodes, the KTD algorithm demonstrates higher accuracy than other methods. Additionally, it shows high discriminative power and good time performance, making it suitable for large-scale complex networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.