Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705747›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Measuring negative emotions and stress through acoustic correlates in speech: A systematic review.

Lilien Schewski, Mathew Magimai Doss, Guido Beldi, Sandra Keller

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lilien SchewskiDepartment for Biomedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6771-4537
Mathew Magimai DossIdiap Research Institute, Martigny, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-1409
Guido BeldiDepartment for Biomedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sandra KellerDepartment for Biomedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech analysis offers a non-invasive method for assessing emotional and cognitive states through acoustic correlates, including spectral, prosodic, and voice quality features. Despite growing interest, research remains inconsistent in identifying reliable acoustic markers, providing limited guidance for researchers and practitioners in the field. This review identifies key acoustic correlates for detecting negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load in speech. A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Scopus. Peer-reviewed articles reporting studies conducted with healthy adult participants were included. Thirty-eight articles were reviewed, encompassing 39 studies, as one article reported on two studies. Among all features, prosodic features were the most investigated and showed the greatest accuracy in detecting negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load. Specifically, anger was associated with elevated fundamental frequency (F0), increased speech volume, and faster speech rate. Stress was associated with increased F0 and intensity, and reduced speech duration. Cognitive load was linked to increased F0 and intensity, although the results for F0 were overall less clear than those for negative emotions and stress. No consistent acoustic patterns were identified for fear or anxiety. The findings support speech analysis as a useful tool for researchers and practitioners aiming to assess negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load in experimental and field studies.

Indexed as

EmotionsSpeechSpeech AcousticsStress, PsychologicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID40705747
PMCPMC12289014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.