ArticlePloS one2025
Reasoning action-centric temporal relations at rich feature hierarchies for action recognition.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reasoning temporal relations among action-related objects plays an important role in action recognition. However, previous approaches only focus the reasoning on high-level semantics and inevitably involve the background in reasoning. In this work, we propose to formulate the temporal relational reasoning in an action-centric and hierarchical style, with a novel Action-centric Temporal-relational Reasoning (ATR) block. Specifically, ATR comprises two components: an Action-related Region Locator (ARL) to locate the action-related regions via estimating the actionness, and an Efficient Action-centric Reasoner (EAR) to efficiently reason the temporal relations between the located regions so as to realize the action-centric reasoning. Thanks to its flexible and efficient designs, our ATR can be directly integrated into existing action recognition models at different depths, empowering the hierarchical reasoning on the action-centric temporal relations at the cost of minor computational overhead. We extensively evaluate our ATR block on three action recognition benchmarks, Something-Something V1, V2, and Kinetics, with the backbones of TSN, TSM, and SlowOnly. The consistent and notable improvements over the strong baselines sufficiently corroborate the effectiveness of ATR, along with the action-centric and hierarchical formulation for temporal relational reasoning. Our proposed approach provides potential practical significance for real-world scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.