ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Enhancing sexual and reproductive health decision-making skills in underserved communities in Ghana: A quasi-experimental study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Literacy-sensitive sexual and reproductive health education for adolescents in Ghana: Evidence from a school-based quasi-experimental study.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- From standard text to simplified learning: a conceptual framework for developing adolescent-friendly sexual and reproductive health resources in Ghana.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Literacy and Service Utilization Among Young People in Southwest Nigeria.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) decision-making is crucial for long-term well-being. It plays a significant role in public health efforts, including reducing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and teenage pregnancies. While cultural and socio-political influences on adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) decision-making are well-documented, less is known about the effect of SRH educational materials' difficulty levels on decision-making, particularly in Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa. This study used a quasi-experimental design to assess the effectiveness of SRH educational materials of varying difficulty levels on decision-making skills using 317 adolescents, ages 11-15. Participants were assigned to a control group or one of the three intervention arms: difficult text, simplified text-only, or picture-enhanced text. Over six weeks, weekly sessions were conducted, followed by an end-line assessment with 249 participants and an 8-week post-intervention evaluation. Data analysis employed SPSS (version 26.0) and STATA (version 15.0), utilizing difference-in-difference and high-dimension fixed-effects models, paired sample t-test, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Results show participants (66%) were females and were 7th graders (56%). All three treatments, difficult text (10.808 points; CI = 1.2-20.36; P = 0.027), simplified text (11.60 points; CI = 4.68-18.52; P = 0.001), and picture-enhanced text (11.145 points; CI = 3.96-18.32; P = 0.002) significantly improved adolescents' decision-making scores. After controlling for time-invariant characteristics within groups, the difficult-text material's effect on decision-making scores declined (β3 = -6.442 points; CI = -13.908 to 1.096; P = 0.094) while that of the simplified and picture-enhanced materials was maintained. The study highlights the need for well-designed materials and effective pedagogy in SRH education to enhance learning and retention. Incorporating structured reading and discussion-based sessions into the school health program is recommended to promote the real-world application of SRH information and improve long-term SRH outcomes in adolescents.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.