ArticlePloS one2025
Serum 25(OH)D levels and mortality risk among middle-aged and elderly populations in the U.S.: A prospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between vitamin D and inflammatory markers in the Chinese healthy adult population: a cross-sectional study.Food & nutrition research · 2026Article
- Vitamin D deficiency in mice modulates oral microbiome stability over time and leads to changes in host inflammatory gene expression pathways.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The association of serum D-vitamin concentration with 10-year cardiovascular disease event risk among Russian, Somali, and Kurdish origin migrants and the general Finnish population.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among middle-aged and elderly populations in the U.S.
methodsData were sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2018. A total of 22,130 participants aged 40-70 years were included. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations were measured and categorized. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality. Multivariable-adjusted models and various statistical analyses were employed.
resultsThe prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (≤50.00 nmol/L) was 33.59%, and insufficiency (≤75.00 nmol/L) was 71.74%. For all-cause mortality, the multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) across different 25(OH)D levels (< 25.00, 25.00-49.99, 50.00-74.99, and ≥ 75.00 nmol/L) were 1.00, 0.78 (0.65, 0.93) p = 0.0069, 0.59 (0.49,0.72) p < 0.0001, and 0.54 (0.44, 0.66) p < 0.0001 respectively. Similar patterns were observed for CVD mortality. There was no significant difference in cancer mortality between the moderately deficient and severely deficient groups, but lower mortality was found in the insufficient and sufficient groups compared to the severely deficient group. An L-shaped association between serum vitamin D levels and mortality was identified. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the main findings.
conclusionThis study found that higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are linked to lower all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. The relationship is nonlinear: increases in concentration reduce death risk below a certain threshold, but above it, the association weakens. Further research is needed to understand causal mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.