ArticlePloS one2025
High acceptability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease among post-natal mothers in Western Kenya.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Newborn Screening in Africa: A Scoping Review.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Transforming Hematology Care in Africa: Strategies for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A maximal-coverage approach to prioritizing newborn sickle cell screening sites in Uganda using a sickle cell-malaria co-risk surface.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Newborn Screening for Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemias: Brief History, Recent Activities, and Global Status-2026.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Advances and Gaps in Global Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease is a genetically inherited blood disorder that manifests early in life with resultant significant health complications. Globally, nearly three quarters of all affected babies are in sub-Saharan Africa. Early identification of babies with sickle cell disease through newborn screening followed by early linkage to care is recommended. However, the program has not been widely adopted in the sub-Saharan Africa. The Kenyan ministry of health, in 2020, published a policy on newborn screening for sickle cell disease from levels 2-6 healthcare facilities. However, evidence on acceptability of newborn screening to scale up newborn screening program is scarce. Few studies have been conducted across the sub-Saharan Africa to assess the acceptability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease with conflicting results. This study assessed factors associated with acceptability of newborn screening among mothers of newborns delivered at Homa bay county teaching and referral hospital, western Kenya. This study employed a cross-sectional design among postnatal mothers at Homa bay county teaching and referral hospital with 399 postnatal mothers enrolled into the study. After obtaining informed consent from the postnatal mothers, a semi-structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, and perception were assessed. Babies were also screened for sickle cell disease using Sickle SCAN point-of-care test. The acceptability was calculated as percentage of mothers accepting to have their babies screened. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to explore factors associated with acceptability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease. Ninety-four percent of mothers accepted newborn screening for sickle cell disease. Only maternal age and occupation were significantly associated with acceptability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease. Mothers aged 25-34 years were 3 times less likely to accept newborn screening for sickle cell disease than those younger mothers than 25 years (OR=0.33;95%CI = 0.13-0.86; p = 0.024).Similarly, mothers in the formal employment were 6 times less likely to accept newborn screening for sickle cell disease than those who were students (OR= 0.16; 95%CI = 0.03-0.84; p = 0.031).Mothers who were in formal employment were 25 times less likely to accept newborn screening for sickle cell disease than those who were students in the multivariate logistic analysis model (aOR= 0.04; 95% CI = 0.00-0.78; p = 0.034). The acceptability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease is high in the county. The Homabay county ministry of health should implement routine newborn screening for sickle cell disease in all healthcare facilities conducting deliveries of newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.