Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40705715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Deep learning for pediatric chest x-ray diagnosis: Repurposing a commercial tool developed for adults.

Prerana Agarwal, Alexander Rau, Helen Ngo, Ambika Seth, Fabian Bamberg, Elmar Kotter, Jakob Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prerana AgarwalDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-6727
Alexander RauDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-6043
Helen NgoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ambika SethLunit, 7F, 374, Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elmar KotterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-6000
Jakob WeissDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support radiological workflows is constantly increasing, yet dedicated solutions for children are largely unavailable. Here, we repurposed an AI-tool developed for chest radiograph interpretation in adults (Lunit INSIGHT CXR) and investigated its diagnostic performance in a real-world pediatric clinical dataset. 958 consecutive frontal chest radiographs of children aged 2-14 years were included and analyzed with the commercially available AI-tool. The reference standard was determined in a dedicated reading session by a board-certified radiologist. The original reports validated by specialized pediatric radiologists, were considered as second readings. All discordant findings were reanalyzed in consensus. The diagnostic performance of the AI-tool was validated using standard measures of accuracy. For this, the continuous AI output (ranging from 0-100) was binarized using vendor recommended thresholds recommended for adults and optimized thresholds identified for children. Relevant findings were defined as consolidation, atelectasis, nodule, cardiomegaly, mediastinal widening due to mass, pleural effusion and pneumothorax. 200 radiographs [20.9%] demonstrated at least one relevant pathology. Using the adult threshold, the AI-tool showed a high performance for all relevant findings with an AUC 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) and. In stratified analysis by age (2-7 vs. 7-14-years-old) a significantly higher performance (p < 0.001) was found for older children with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 82.3% respectively, which further increased using optimized thresholds for children. Repurposing existing AI-tools developed for adult application to pediatric patients could support clinical workflows until dedicated solutions become available.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40705715
PMCPMC12289065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.