SynthesisPain2025
Enhancing clinical translation of analgesics for neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of non-evoked pain assessment in preclinical trials.
Synthesis in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the translational value of animal models in developing pain-targeting therapies for clinical osteoarthritis.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Bioactive compounds for neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain management: molecular and cellular mechanisms.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Barettin, a Nonopioid, Nonhallucinogenic Marine Natural Product with Antihyperalgesic Properties Mediated by 5HT2A Inverse Agonism.Journal of natural products · 2026Article
- Behavioral assessment of pain in rodents: advances from evoked responses to spontaneous states and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The course of mechanical allodynia differs between forelimb innervation territories following median nerve injury in the rat.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCurrent therapies for neuropathic pain are often inadequate and several promising preclinical drugs have failed in clinical trials. This may stem from an overreliance on reflex-based outcomes, which do not accurately reflect the spontaneous or non-evoked pain (NEP) characteristic of neuropathic pain. To bridge this gap, we evaluated the preclinical efficacy of standard analgesics in relieving NEP associated with neuropathic pain, thereby providing valuable insights that could optimize preclinical testing. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (July 2023). A random-effects model evaluated the effect of the intervention, with subgroup analyses exploring variability sources. Of the 91 included studies, 65 were eligible for meta-analysis, yielding 196 drug evaluations. Most evaluations involved traumatic nerve injury (91%) in male animals, although fewer were nontraumatic neuropathies (6%) or spinal cord injuries (4%). Standard pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain relieved NEP with efficacy patterns closely matching clinical results. Tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors showed the highest efficacy, followed by gabapentinoids and strong opioids, whereas nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and mild opioids had no significant effect. Next, we confirmed that all the NEP-related behaviors were significantly alleviated by standard analgesics, validating that they are indeed pain associated. Moreover, drug efficacy was greater in traumatic nerve injury models compared with nontraumatic neuropathy models. In conclusion, standard analgesics demonstrated robust preclinical efficacy in alleviating NEP, mirroring their clinical performance. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating assessments of spontaneous pain into classical tests in preclinical studies to enhance the clinical translation of investigational analgesics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.